Category Archives: Us Treasury Bonds

Yield Curve Today

So we have this big party atmosphere, spurred on by Mr. Draghi and the omnipresent US disgrace called ZIRP.  But for a day at least, players are looking like they are risk ‘OFF’ when viewed through the bond market’s lens.


10, 5 & 2 year Treasury yields from Bloomberg

Not only are yields down (T bonds up), but the 2 year yield is down heartily.  Normally a stock market pump sucks them right out of the short end and into risk markets.  The curve is rising as rates drop.

As I said in the previous post, this year is gonna be interesting.  In fact, it already is; very much so.

US Treasury Bonds, Gold & Stock Market

The following is one of a wide range of analytical topics covered in NFTRH 293’s 35 pages this week, much of which is straight ahead technical analysis.  But the T Bond market is usually central to an overall macro view at any given time.  This segment is not meant to provide actionable direction (other than perhaps to prepare for a potential rise in T bonds yields), it is meant to dig into the mechanics beneath the financial markets in an effort to have people consider that there is much more going on with markets than simple nominal TA or conventional fundamental analysis (PE ratios, growth metrics, reported economic data, etc.) can account for.

US Treasury Bonds


10 & 30yr yields have declined to support as NFTRH projected

Yields on long-term Treasuries have continued to decline in line with our view that was contrary the ‘Great Rotation’ (out of bonds) hype. The [30-year] especially is now close to support and the next play seems like it could be rising yields and declining T bonds.

Our long-term ‘Continuum’ chart; yields approach support

The 30-year ‘Continuum’ view above makes the simple case that players had to be put offside believing in the ‘Great Rotation’ at 4% yields. The nearly half-year decline since then has now satisfied the chart as yields have come to our 3.1% to 3.2% target range, where there is support.

Continue reading

‘Anti Fragile’

By way of John Mauldin, my inbox received these thoughts by Louis-Vincent Gave as part of an article entitled Why Are Bond Yields So Low?

Some points of interest…

An inherent level of systemic risk? Most people intuitively feel Karl Popper’s observation that: “In an economic system, if the goal of the authorities is to reduce some particular risks, then the sum of all these suppressed risks will reappear one day through a massive increase in the systemic risk and this will happen because the future is unknowable”. In other words, suppress risk somewhere and it comes back with a vengeance to bite you on the derriere at some later date. Look at 2008 as an example: we cut up credit-issuing risk into tiny parcels and distributed it across the system through securitization, only to see the banks take on a lot more leverage and ultimately sink their balance sheets on instruments they failed to understand. Hyman Minsky summed up this inherent contradiction well when he stated that “stability breeds instability”. In other words, the more stable a thing is, the temptation rises to pile on leverage, which makes that “something” more unstable on the back end.

This is the whole point, that it is permissive policy that instigates bad financial behavior (encourages ever riskier speculative activity), not that the policy itself is the culprit where the inevitable unwinding (the bust side of the boom-bust equation) of speculation is concerned.

The notion of Anti-Fragile: the above brings us to the Nassim Taleb notion of “anti-fragile”: just as a parent who overly cocoons a child prepares that offspring poorly to function in the wider world, so policy-makers intent on cushioning the private sector from every shock in the economic cycle are doing the overall system a massive disservice. By preventing the build-up of immunity, or the ability to thrive in crises (i.e., anti-fragility), policymakers sow the seed for a greater crisis down the road (hence the repeated cycle of crises).

Safe in Daddy’s arms since 2008 and now coddled and nurtured by Mommy.  There are supposedly serious commentators out there loudly lauding the idea that Ben Bernanke saved the financial system.  Well, he and now she are doing it again.  But the root elements are the same as what Greenspan did early last decade.  They have simply offloaded risk from speculators to a bond market (in this case Treasuries vs. various commercial credit vehicles in the last cycle).  Either way, the goal is risk ‘ON’ (and it is).

Lay the blame on zero interest-rate policy (ZIRP): following on the above, not only does ZIRP allow the survival of zombie companies (which drags down the returns for everyone) but it most certainly affects investors’ behavior. Firstly, by encouraging banks to play the yield curve and buy long bonds, rather than go out and lend. Secondly, because almost all investors hold part of their assets in equities and part in cash or fixed incomes. And in a world in which fixed income instruments yield close to nothing, the tolerance for pain in other asset classes probably diminishes all the more. 

In other words, get out of savings and into assets.  But when the inevitable corrections come in asset markets there is little income to be found in fixed income.  If Grandma gets chewed up and spit out in the process?  So be it I guess.

Yield Curve; Wax Off, Wax Back on Again

The casino is in operation day after day, week after week… yield curve up, yield curve down… markets up, markets down.  Wax is on today and the yield curve is down.  Funny how it was up yesterday with declining yields and it is down today with rising yields.  Hey, it’s all good and it all makes sense in the casino that Bernanke built (or rebuilt after Greenspan’s fell apart).


10, 5 & 2 year yields from Bloomberg

Yield Curve up Again

At some point this will start getting positive for gold and maybe not so good for the risk ‘ON’ trade.  Here is the curve rising again today as people pile drive into short term bonds more quickly than long term ones.  Bunch of crack freaks if you ask me; risk ‘ON’, risk ‘OFF’ and on and on.  Life in a casino.


10, 5 & 2 year yields today, from Bloomberg

The Continuum

You did not hear about the red dotted line (AKA the monthly EMA 100 ‘limiter’) on the ‘Continuum’ anywhere else at the height of the Great Rotation Promotion.  Just here; though I recall Jeff Gundlach remaining firm on T bonds in the face of the hype.  Now the herds pile into T bonds as risk starts going ‘OFF’ (as so many indicators have hinted could happen).


30 year yield (AKA the ‘Continuum’) from NFTRH 281

Ah, but there is a support level we have had on radar since the yield topped out.  I already sold TLT (20+ year bonds) and will probably do the same with IEF (7-10 year) shortly, keeping bonds in the 0-3 year range (come on Janet, end ZIRP).  TLT is getting over bought and the momo herd is in motion running from stock market risk into T bonds.  Unsavory characters they are, with little moral compass and even less common sense.

Also at some point, another risk ‘OFF’ asset is probably going to find support, bottom out and lead a coming phase.  We’ve got a 2014 Macro Pivot theme in play after all.  First the gold bug leaders have to finish getting debunked and strung up by the true believers.

Treasury Yields Updated

Treasury yields are dropping but the curve is rising again today as risk goes ‘OFF’ and the curve starts to become notable by some short term technical parameters as reviewed in an NFTRH update yesterday.


10, 5 & 2yr yields from Bloomberg

As for the 10 year yield on its own, here’s the current view.  Think about all the Wall Street media’s touts to get out of Treasury bonds and into stocks late last year when yields were topping out (bonds bottoming).  Great Rotation Promotion.


Disgusting Chart of the Week… Ten Year Yield

I can’t help but think of the millions who must’ve made real world alterations to their investment portfolios because of the Great Promotion Rotation into stocks and out of bonds that the media pitched last year.  How do these promoters get away with things, and not ever seem to have their feet held to the fire?


As noted, I sold 20+ year T bond fund TLT, but still hold 7-10 year IEF in line with the bearish chart above.  See if I can’t collect more dividends and add to principle to boot.  Hey, that is not a reco.  What do you think this site is, Wall Street?