Tag Archives: Ben Bernanke

It’s the Mixed Signals Market

I have made no bones about the fact that some of the tools I have depended on have stopped working, at least temporarily.  For example, the gold-silver ratio would normally have croaked junk bonds and the stock market by now.  For another, the 30yr-2yr yield spread would have pulled gold up as opposed to its current bear market state.  There have been other indicators that have just stopped working and the temptation is to rave “Bernanke this!” and “Bernanke that!”

But that does no good.  Bernanke is winning (duh) and he is the man on the cover of the Atlantic, smugly grinning out from behind the bold headline The Hero.  I on the other hand am just a schmo with some broken tools.  But I also have nominal technical charts that have helped avoid the hazards that we might believe active policy making have wired in to the markets.

By the way, speaking of indicators that don’t seem to make sense, why on earth are T bonds (which do not like inflation) and commodities (which do) both getting hammered today?

tlt.dbc

TLT & DBC hourly

The hit to commodities of course has something to do with the strength in the USD* (which we have noted over the last several weeks is on a bullish – not bearish – signal by weekly chart), but what on earth is up with T bonds if inflation is not an issue?  Could it be that somewhere in the T bond market lies the future undoing of the Hero’s myth?

I am going nowhere with this post other than it is an over-stimulated market with policy makers front, center and every which way screwing with normal market management.  Within that context, survival in the short term in service to proper positioning in real value over the long term is vital.

Gold bugs may be right with the hysteria (like that showing up in my inbox) about Cypress being the first leg kicked out from under the neatly set table, and oncoming confiscatory policies.  But those that went all in with ideology are paying the dearest price in the interim.  This is speaking of the paper markets, anyway.  Gold is gold (value) in the monetary realm and ain’t nothing gonna change that.

The play remains to be intact first and ready to capitalize second.  That is because the other way around, trying to capitalize (on ideology) first and be intact second is not working and has not worked for over a half a year, and has not worked well for 2 years.

* Here is the weekly USD chart from NFTRH 230, created 7 weeks ago noting a bullish moving average cross.

usd

US dollar, weekly

Young FrankenMarket Lives

Excerpted from Notes From the Rabbit Hole #237:

Young FrankenMarket Lives

In failing to take a “healthy” correction to the equivalent of SPX 1350 to 1450 from the upside target zone of 1550 to 1590, the market is now running on policy and momentum. Hence we now dub thee Young FrankenMarket; Ben Bernanke’s creation, sustained by government and legacy MBS debt, following Alan Greenspan’s monster that was stitched together with artificially low interest rates that ultimately manifested in a huge commercial credit bubble.

Payrolls came in at 165,000 and an over bought, over loved* market popped its cork and exploded into blue sky. It had to be more than an okay ‘jobs’ report that did the trick. It was likely the combination of a still inflating Fed (and ECB, Europe popped hard as well) with some data that was good enough, but not so good as to call into question the Fed’s systematic inflation regime. This is Bernanke’s FrankenMarket, created by policy.

After making bearish patterns and/or negatively diverging from the Dow and S&P 500, the Russell 2000, Nasdaq 100 and Semiconductors all broke to new all-time (RUT) or recovery (NDX, SOX) highs on Friday. This left one notable holdout, the often-watched Transports. Since I normally do not give much weight to Dow Theory, I’ll not do so now. But it should be noted that the Trannies are not at new highs… yet [edit: They are now].

So it appears that recent writing I have done about a topping process may have been incorrect or at least, early. The current period reminds me a lot of Greenspan’s monster that emerged from the credit bubble early last decade, FrankenMarket as I called it in the first public article I ever wrote.

I remember wanting to be bearish [in 2004] because bearish seemed like the honest way to be. You cannot after all create (print) a bull market and a sound economy to go with it, can you? Well, yes and no.

Through interest rate manipulation, Greenspan created a bull market that really wasn’t (as measured in gold, which stripped out inflation’s effects and gave a ‘real’ and bearish view by the Dow-Gold ratio).

As noted previously, the But It Is What It Is website name came in large part due to my realization that the bull (in nominal stock prices) should not be fought as I looked around and saw (non-gold bug) perma-bears being blown up left and right. Any gold bull who was also bearish the stock market likely did just fine. But the play was long gold, and avoid or long the stock market.

Today we are challenged with a different monster. This one is more dangerous to the honest money contingent because it appears the golden shield has melted down and stopped protecting people from the obvious inflation being promoted in service to liquefying the banks, propping the economy and promoting a stock market bubble.

But here we have to take a step back and realize that it was 10+ years of bull bull bull for gold. Who are we to say what type of corrections should be suffered along the way? Stripping out the emotion, what we have is a really smart (I’d say diabolical in a way that is not entirely negative) policy maker who has somehow either engineered a ‘best of all worlds’ Goldilocks environment or taken the horseshoe out of his ass and hung it up on the wall of his well-appointed office.

I think it might be the latter, which in less crude terms means that it was just time for a technical adjustment. I hate to qualify the pain real people are suffering as an “adjustment”, but think about it. The negative energy at the bottom of markets and the economy in 2008/2009 was incredible. This very letter reproduced the Time Magazine Depression 2.0 ‘breadlines’ cover in support of its then bullish orientation.

Markets may need to work their way through an equal and opposite upside blow off before all is said and done. Who knows when that will come? It could be next week or it could be next year. But it is a near certainty that sentiment will play a big role.

For now, the trends are the trends, there are few signs that anyone is getting concerned about inflation and hence, the inflation continues. It is the Alice in Wonderland market:

“Nothing would be what it is because everything would be what it isn’t. And contrary-wise; what it is it wouldn’t be, and what it wouldn’t be, it would. You see?”  –Alice

* AAII (Individual Inventors) had been an inexplicably skittish exception, as its members have fled to a bearish stance at the first sign of every recent minor correction. This had been a caveat to the bear case and the market will now try to suck them and any other holdouts in before a top is realized.

Notes From the Rabbit Hole has been following events with great interest since the Fed’s QE regime kicked in to its new phase (III), and technical analysis has kept us on the right side. When I named the newsletter I did so with Alice’s quote above in mind. Never has the idea of accepting what is contrary and counterintuitive been so important for everyone from speculators to savers to honest money advocates.

We remain intact first, and ready for opportunity – that “contrary-wise” could be big opportunity – second.

Biiwii.com, NFTRH, Twitter, Free eLetter

Pump Ben… Pump

Live blog of Bernanke’s first day of testimony via MarketWatch

[edit]  From MW:

Here’s the key paragraph from Bernanke’s testimony (bolding is mine, not Ben’s): “The Committee also stated that in determining the size, pace, and composition of its asset purchases, it will take appropriate account of their likely efficacy and costs. In other words, as with all of its policy decisions, the Committee continues to assess its program of asset purchases within a cost-benefit framework. In the current economic environment, the benefits of asset purchases, and of policy accommodation more generally, are clear: Monetary policy is providing important support to the recovery while keeping inflation close to the FOMC’s 2 percent objective. Notably, keeping longer-term interest rates low has helped spark recovery in the housing market and led to increased sales and production of automobiles and other durable goods. By raising employment and household wealth–for example, through higher home prices–these developments have in turn supported consumer sentiment and spending. “

From Biiwii:

outer limits

There is nothing wrong with your television set. Do not attempt to adjust the picture. We are controlling transmission. If we wish to make it louder, we will bring up the volume. If we wish to make it softer, we will tune it to a whisper. We will control the horizontal. We will control the vertical. We can roll the image, make it flutter. We can change the focus to a soft blur or sharpen it to crystal clarity. For the next hour, sit quietly and we will control all that you see and hear. We repeat: there is nothing wrong with your television set. You are about to participate in a great adventure. You are about to experience the awe and mystery which reaches from the inner mind to — The Outer Limits.

[edit]  Okay, here is Dear (Monetary) Leader Live.

He’s glad handing himself; self-congratulatory tone.

[edit]  Ha ha ha… “I think they should try to get rid of deflation… I support their effort to get rid of deflation”

Yes Ben, why didn’t we all just think of that.  Let’s just get rid of deflation!  Ha ha ha…

Tutti-Fruiti Sundaes for All!

soda jerkMy late friend Jonathan – who’s strength of character and spirit I swear I shall try to channel going forward – reported to me in the 2007 run up to the great crash of ’08 about the dark fashions he observed in the windows of Madison Avenue.

We used to discuss this, in the context of Robert Prechter’s ‘Socionomic’ vision and with anticipation of a coming reckoning, which of course came in the form of Armageddon ’08.

I found this September 2011 note from him as I was cleaning out old emails:

“Recall a couple of years ago discussing the dark fashions in those windows still lit on Madison Ave? Take a look recently? The colors are vibrant. Take a vision of little Benny Bernanke working behind the counter of daddy’s drug store whipping up his special tutti-fruiti sundae.”

I think it is quite appropriate right now.  Only maybe Jon did not account for just how cynical and scheming little Benny’s brain actually was under that funny paper soda jerk hat.  Yes, I am referencing Operation Twist.  You will recall that Twist began its disgusting regime of painting the macro in… you got it, September of 2011.

Everybody’s enjoying little Benny’s treats in January, 2013.  On special today:  Goldilocks Crunch.

Morning Reading

biiwii.com

Risk Management for Technical Traders  Jeffrey Kennedy  1.15.13
Going to the Movies  James Howard Kunstler  1.15.13
Gold Chart of the Week  Ino Traders Blog  1.15.13
An Alternative Approach to Entitlement Problems  Nathan Lewis  1.15.13
Trillion Dollar Battle: Print, Baby, Print!  Axel Merk  1.15.13
Gold Mining Investing: Merchant Bank Style  TGR  1.15.13
Has a New China Bull Market Begun?  B.I.G.  1.15.13
Fed Chief Downplays Inflation Risk of QE3  MarketWatch  1.15.13

More Guest Commentary

Bernanke Presses Lawmakers to Resolve the…

ben bernankeWell, you know; the latest in a long line of (should be trademarked) buzz phrases that the market has to obsess on.

Armageddon ’08 © (that’s mine), Hope ’09 © (mine too), Flash Crash ™, Congressional Debt Squabble ™, Euro Crisis ™, i2K12 © (mine, and despite QE-lite we’re still waiting, Gary) Greek Austerity ™ and now… the Fiscal Cliff ™.

I have to tell you I hate this latest one.  Seriously, it’s annoying because it seems to have come on like gangbusters when everybody knew it was there so many months ago.  I myself made personal preparations for it back in the spring.  It’s as if the noise waited until the election was over (sorry, no buzz phrase for that one).  I guess our attention span can only handle one hype fest at a time.

Anyway, here’s MarketWatch with a wrap up of Ben’s speech.

Bernanke Presses Lawmakers to Resolve Fiscal Cliff ™

Curiously…

He urged the members of Congress not to kick the can down the road.

But then…

Looming in the background is the need for Congress to pass another increase in the federal debt ceiling, now set at $16.4 trillion.

Fractious talks between the two sides in the summer of 2011 over an increase in the debt limit disrupted financial markets and the economy, Bernanke said.

“A failure to reach a timely agreement this time around could impose even heavier economic and financial costs,” Bernanke said.

The Treasury Department said that the government will come close to the ceiling by the end of the year. Special accounting techniques can then delay hitting the ceiling for a few more months.

“Coming together to find fiscal solutions will not be easy, but the stakes are high,” Bernanke said.

Is he saying to come together and agree on how to increase the debt limit (kick the can) or is he advocating actual cutting so that we live within our means?  I am curious.  Thus far congress has raised the limit and the Fed has sopped up bonds that result from this debt.

Is this all an exercise in following verbal breadcrumbs?  Where is the value at the end of the trail?  I don’t even really know what he is saying.  He says don’t kick the can but he is promoting can kicking by monetizing debt.  Is that not true?