Tag Archives: deflation

How to Play the FOMC? Risk Management

How to play the FOMC?  Does it matter beyond “manage risk?” asked the robotic blogger.*

The Fed has been using its jawbones as well as talking out of every other orifice over the last month or two with regard to ‘taper or not to taper’.  The stock market is at the moment on a tout that sees them saying ‘never mind about the taper stuff for now.  We were just floating a trial balloon to prick the speculative atmosphere’.

The US dollar has been hammered but is now at a support point.  Inflationists are wondering why on earth are commodities so weak and precious metals so bearish while Uncle Buck is on the mat like this?  And that is a good question.

usd

USD daily

I am sure many people are thinking that T bond yields are indicating economic growth or at least that inflation is coming, but I am not so sure.  There is this man of infinite patience and consistency of message – a super robot* really – who sees higher bond yields as fitting in nicely with a deflationary scenario.  That would be Robert Prechter.  His view is that yields would not be rising because of the usual ‘inflationary expectations’ or economic growth, but because of impending debt default.

There is that word again; D.E.B.T. and with stocks again soaring amid robust use of margin (yeh, yeh, I have heard all about that money on the sidelines, but much of the money that is playing the market is borrowed).  I would have to think that a large proportion of the money on the sidelines is a) being used by individuals and businesses to repair balance sheets and deleverage (deflationary) and b) sitting on the books of banks and other privileged corporations.

This last condition could change if – and it is still a big if – the banks are compelled to put that money to work with the prospect of higher interest rate return (our ‘taper to carry’ thesis).

usd

USD monthly

But in an era when governments competitively try to stave off debt reckoning by compromising currency (some might say the oldest monetary trick in the book), a currency with as much upside potential as the USD – especially after the hard decline of the last month – is not going to prove convenient to the inflationary growth crowd.

This brings me to another thought.  You know how Ben Bernanke is public enemy #1 in the gold “community”?  Well, was he not once thought of as Helicopter Ben, subject to mockery and ridicule but also depended upon as the great inflator who would personally enrich the community’s memebers?  What if – the brilliant Op/Twist aside – he is the same old Ben but the inflation is just not working?  What if he is just as nonplussed as the average gold bug or commodity bull?

I am just asking questions here.  The stock market is the last man standing and could be on its final tout as well.  Maybe the precious metals blow off in 2011 was the kickoff to a new era where they lead commodities, T bonds and finally stocks, down into a phase where there is only one king and his name is Cash.

currency

USD, Euro, Yen, Aussie & Canada, weekly

The USD is still on a bull signal with the cross of the weekly EMA 10 over the EMA 35.  If this is negated then we might watch the monthly for failure.  But USD is still bullish until then.  We might want to watch the Aussie dollar with respect to any ‘inflation trade’ potential.  Crude oil, as already noted, looks bullish for a trade.  The majority of the commodity complex is however, in a sad state.

In a deflationary scenario on the other hand, King Dollar – the reserve currency and marker of claims to a world full of assets -  would rule.  The ruthlessly abused Yen and the Barbarous Relic of monetary value would eventually play roles in a rush to liquidity as well.  But I think it would be prime time for Uncle Buck first and foremost for a while.

* Why not stick to what has worked in robotic fashion during a phase when markets appear so screwed up that luminary market players are publicly considering cashing in and leaving the game due to the messed up signals that meddlesome policy, systematic manipulation and investment by machines have injected.  In my case what has worked is risk management and risk management only over the last 6 months and really, two years.  I’ll stick with it until I get solid data.

Biiwii.com, Notes From the Rabbit Hole

Guest Market Analysis, News & Commentary

biiwii.com

(e) = external link

Deflation Isn’t an Export; Crazy Talk is  Michael Ashton  6.4.13
Out on a Limb  James Howard Kunstler  6.4.13
Sell the Dollar?  Case for Hard Currencies  Axel Merk  6.4.13
Explaining the Gold Bull Market  Steve Saville  6.4.13 (pdf)
Annual Report 2012  Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis  6.4.13 (e)
Wounded Heart  Bill Gross  6.4.13 (e)
Gameplan for a Completely Corrupted Market  Cody Willard  6.4.13 (e)
Japan’s Easy Money Tsunami  David Howden  6.4.13 (e)
March Housing Numbers  B.I.G.  6.4.13 (e)

More…

A ‘Carry Trade’ Returns?

As I was charting long-term Treasury yields in NFTRH 241, I ran a chart of the ratio between the banks and the S&P 500 and what do you know?  The ratio had broken out to the upside right along with long-term interest rates.  ‘Hmmm…’ said I, ‘maybe this is relevant to the analysis.’  ;-)

Excerpted from NFTRH 241:

bkx.spx.tnx

BKX-SPX ratio w/ 10 year yield, weekly

“The Bank Index ratio to the S&P 500 (BKX-SPX) is breaking out to the upside in defiance of a bear case in stocks.  The BKX has modestly led the SPX since 2011.  We have noted that this is a necessary bullish factor for the financialized economy, which is quite different from a real or organic economy.

Remember the ‘carry trade’ of the Greenspan era?  That would be the same carry trade that helped bloat the banking sector, putting its big, fat too big to fail hands in just about every cookie jar in America.
 
The banks love rising long-term yields because they basically receive free money from the Federal Reserve as the first users of newly created funds on the short end, which is being held down by ZIRP.  They then roll these funds into loan products, mark them up per long-term yields and voila, instant profits courtesy of a ‘borrow short, lend long’ gimmick.
 
Let’s see how this develops, but we should note that Bernanke has not created anything new under the sun.  The great carry trade of last decade was just another unnatural systemic stress that led to the 2008 resolution.
 
Do you suppose that Fed officials are ready to let the banks do the heavy lifting, now with the incentive (carry) to get the funds ‘out there’ to the public?  This condition came hand in hand with an inflation problem last decade and now that everybody seems to know there is no inflation, would not a new phase of rising inflation expectations go well right about now?”

Bottom Line

Talk of QE tapering may not only not mean the end of any prospects for inflation, but may actually be part of the kickoff to a new phase of increasing inflation expectations as the banks may now have incentive to get the newly printed money ‘out there’.  The banks have been liquified through ZIRP and the prospect of a profitable ‘carry trade’ dynamic becoming engaged going forward should be factored into investors’ outlooks across a broad spectrum of assets and markets.

With precious metals and commodities so far down in the dumps and a certain NYU rock star economics professor out front talking down gold and talking up a dis-inflationary backdrop, might we not at least consider the contrarian possibilities of an inflationary phase to come?

If you’d like an affordable weekly guide (with interim updates as needed) that is always on the job for its clients’ best interests, I’d be more than happy to welcome you to the ‘Notes From the Rabbit Hole‘ Premium subscriber base.

Biiwii.com, NFTRH, Twitter, Free eLetter

Prechter Takes a Bow

We all know the story.  Bearish at 350, 420, 600 and so on.  He was also bearish at 1900.  But what I find interesting is that Bob Prechter has also consistently recognized and promoted two seemingly opposed ideas:

  1. Gold was in an over-loved bull mania
  2. Gold is real money

A cornerstone of my personal philosophy from day one has been to not worry about the price of gold, because it is not about price.  It is about securing off the grid value within a system that has so obviously gone berserk.  I see no change what so ever to that view currently.

But I also realize that a lot of gold bugs are (in my opinion) unhealthy players with too-limited, or single-minded viewpoints.  Do you think it is bravado or reverse psychology when I write that gold can easily drop 100 or more bucks in a day or ultimately go below 1000?  It is not.  It is the realization that it is the propped up paper and digital world of highly gamed finance that is in motion, not gold.  In that context, the value assigned to it can also rise to heights unimagined by today’s frightened players.  So what?  Gold just sits there.  The system is in motion.

All of this said, you can get a free report on Prechter’s 5 arguments that refute the heretofore bullish case on gold’s price.  The report is excerpted from the April Elliott Wave Theorist, to which you may recall, I subscribe.  Here are the talking points:

1) Central Bank Buying
2) Fed Inflating
3) The “Crisis Hedge” Argument
4) The “Gold is Cheap” Argument
5) The Conviction that Post-Peak Lows were Support

For me, EWT is now much more about the stock market and the macro global economy in general within the context of rising deflationary pressures.  But this report might be a bit of an intro for anyone interested.  As usual, I’ll note that I am promoting the EWI service with this post.  But it is a service to which I subscribe as part of a well-balanced market intelligence platform.  I also subscribe to other services like Bespoke and McClellan for their unique perspectives on areas that are not within my core focus analytically.

So click the link above or not.  It’s free with no strings, but – cue to jeers and mocking – I do now and always have valued Prechter since first reading 2002′s Conquer the Crash.  But I think for myself at all times, no matter what other analytical sources I take in.  I recommend Prechter wholeheartedly, especially now given my current view on the stock market.

It’s the Mixed Signals Market

I have made no bones about the fact that some of the tools I have depended on have stopped working, at least temporarily.  For example, the gold-silver ratio would normally have croaked junk bonds and the stock market by now.  For another, the 30yr-2yr yield spread would have pulled gold up as opposed to its current bear market state.  There have been other indicators that have just stopped working and the temptation is to rave “Bernanke this!” and “Bernanke that!”

But that does no good.  Bernanke is winning (duh) and he is the man on the cover of the Atlantic, smugly grinning out from behind the bold headline The Hero.  I on the other hand am just a schmo with some broken tools.  But I also have nominal technical charts that have helped avoid the hazards that we might believe active policy making have wired in to the markets.

By the way, speaking of indicators that don’t seem to make sense, why on earth are T bonds (which do not like inflation) and commodities (which do) both getting hammered today?

tlt.dbc

TLT & DBC hourly

The hit to commodities of course has something to do with the strength in the USD* (which we have noted over the last several weeks is on a bullish – not bearish – signal by weekly chart), but what on earth is up with T bonds if inflation is not an issue?  Could it be that somewhere in the T bond market lies the future undoing of the Hero’s myth?

I am going nowhere with this post other than it is an over-stimulated market with policy makers front, center and every which way screwing with normal market management.  Within that context, survival in the short term in service to proper positioning in real value over the long term is vital.

Gold bugs may be right with the hysteria (like that showing up in my inbox) about Cypress being the first leg kicked out from under the neatly set table, and oncoming confiscatory policies.  But those that went all in with ideology are paying the dearest price in the interim.  This is speaking of the paper markets, anyway.  Gold is gold (value) in the monetary realm and ain’t nothing gonna change that.

The play remains to be intact first and ready to capitalize second.  That is because the other way around, trying to capitalize (on ideology) first and be intact second is not working and has not worked for over a half a year, and has not worked well for 2 years.

* Here is the weekly USD chart from NFTRH 230, created 7 weeks ago noting a bullish moving average cross.

usd

US dollar, weekly