Tag Archives: Stock Market

Around the Web

  • Saving Credit (PDF) by one of my personal heroes, Raghuram Rajan, head of the Reserve Bank of India.
  • Updated Thanksgiving week breakdown from QuantEdges.  Just as one little human in the machine, I have noticed over my years in the market that Black Friday almost always seems to be bullish.

 

Buy the All Time High

Guest Post by James Howard Kunstler

Wall Street is only one of several financial roach motels in what has become a giant slum of a global economy. Notional “money” scuttles in for safety and nourishment, but may never get out alive. Tom Friedman of The New York Times really put one over on the soft-headed American public when he declared in a string of books that the global economy was a permanent installation in the human condition. What we’re seeing “out there” these days is the basic operating system of that economy trying to shake itself to pieces.

Continue reading

Around the Web

[edit]  Let’s add a new post at NFTRH.com… Semi Equipment Book-to-Bill Ratio Moderating.

  • NFTRH Dovetails some public content (Stocks vs. CPI and vs. Gold) with some of what this weeks report discussed regarding a potential plan for stocks.
  • Josh Brown on how unfairly Jim Cramer was treated by Jon Stewart during the financial crisis.  Well Josh, I had to laugh at this bit… “Had Cramer pushed back and brought up his vigorously alerting the Federal Reserve to the markets’ problems in advance, it would have been entirely justified.”  I remember the screaming monkey show by a guy who became a made-for-TV alarmist after touting touting and touting stocks some more right into and through the top.  Spare me.  I have however, also been a Daily Show fan from day 1; going all the way back to Craig Kilborn.

 

Around the Web

 

Around the Web

 

Government Banks on Stocks

Guest Post by EWI

The following article was adapted with permission from the November 2014 issue of The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast, a publication from Elliott Wave International, the world’s largest market forecasting firm. Follow this link for the complete article.

Here’s a key principle concerning the role of government in bull and bear markets, as outlined in The Elliott Wave Theorist in 1991:

Government is the ultimate crowd, every decision being made by committee. It is always acting on the last trend. (For example, the Federal government passed securities laws to prevent the 1929-1932 crash…in 1934.)

The Federal government repealed that law, known as Glass-Steagall, in November 1999. [A major peak in stocks] occurred within a matter of weeks, in January 2000. Government’s effort to bring back the old bull market started in 2001 with a bailout of Argentina. Citing a critical difference from prior bull market rescue efforts, the September 2001 issue of The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast asserted that the stock market would fall straight through the effort to shore up that country. It did, as the Dow declined 30% through October 2002.

A similar short-term market plunge through a government-sponsored bailout initiative occurred on October 2. That’s when Mario Draghi, president of the European Central Bank, announced a quantitative easing program under which the central bank will buy $1.3 trillion in loans and mortgages, “including some junk-rated assets from Greece and Cyprus.”

Draghi pulled the trigger even though the Euro Stoxx 50 Index has rallied for almost three years and, at the time of the announcement, was within 5% of its June high.

In 2012, Draghi’s bold “whatever it takes” ad-lib was “seen as a masterstroke that halted the downward economic spiral that had gripped the continent.” This time he fired live rounds in the form of a long-awaited “U.S. Federal Reserve-style QE” program. But the blue chip European stock index gave him no respect; it fell. The Euro Stoxx 50 is still down 3% from its October 2 close.

The performance is similar to what happened in November 2007, when a consortium of banks organized by the U.S. Treasury created a fund (called M-Lec) to rescue the hemorrhaging market for subprime loans. At the time, The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast explained that the difference between bailouts in a healthy bull market and those in a major bear market is that in a bull market the bailouts invariably come near major lows, when the market is ready to turn up anyway. In bear markets, however, pessimism is more persistent, and the stock market ultimately falls through even the most aggressive bailout efforts.

The Elliott Wave Financial Forecast also stated that the “fascinating thing about the bailout attempt is that it was needed before the stock market even headed down. As we said in April [2007]: Chrysler and Continental Illinois were ‘too big to fail,’ the unfolding crisis will be ‘too big to bail.'”

Click here to continue reading about how the ECB’s latest scheme is already failing, and how global governments’ even more pronounced infatuation with stocks suggests an even more dramatic decline ahead >>


Around the Web

 

Around the Web

 

More Investors Intelligence Data

Guest Post by Tom McCellan

Investors Intelligence survey percentage in correction category
November 06, 2014

Last week I wrote about a rather unique way to look at the sentiment data from the weekly Investors Intelligence survey.  This week, I want to expand on that topic a little bit more, and cover the one piece of data in that weekly report which gets the least attention.

Investors Intelligence surveys over 100 investment advisors and newsletter writers, and categorizes them as either (1) Bullish, (2) Bearish, or (3) “Correction”.  That last category is for advisors that are not willing to make a commitment to either a bullish or a bearish stance, and it is the subject of this week’s chart.

Continue reading

Around the Web

  • Across the Curve channels Buffalo Springfield and sees the commodity Armageddon as bond friendly, to the point where Yellen can take the rate hike for 2015 off the table.  Who’d be surprised about that?
  • Reformed Broker on 9 surprising things the subject of my favorite book on trading/investing/markets said.

 

Stock Market Myth #8

Guest Post by Robert Prechter & EWI

Don’t Get Ruined by These 10 Popular Investment Myths (Part VIII)

Interest rates, oil prices, earnings, GDP, wars, peace, terrorism, inflation, monetary policy, etc. — NONE have a reliable effect on the stock market

You may remember that after the 2008-2009 crash, many called into question traditional economic models. Why did they fail?

And more importantly, will they warn us of a new approaching doomsday, should there be one?

This series gives you a well-researched answer. Here is Part VIII; come back soon for Part IX.


Myth #8: Terrorist attacks would cause the stock market to drop.

By Robert Prechter (excerpted from the monthly Elliott Wave Theorist; published since 1979)

I assume this is what economists mean when they say that something unexpected such as a terrorist attack would cause them to re-evaluate their stock market forecasts. At least, I doubt they mean that a terrorist attack would cause them to revise their estimates upward. It seems logical that a scary, destructive terrorist attack, particularly one that implies more attacks to come, would be bearish for stock prices.

Continue reading