Is A 20% 1998-Like Plunge Coming In Stocks?

By Chris Ciovacco

FACTS INSTEAD OF FEAR

When investors see red covering their screens, it can understandably be unnerving.  Since many are comparing the recent move in stocks to the late 1990s (don’t include us on that list),  a fair question might be:

After moving up rapidly in 1998, the S&P 500 plunged over 20%.  Is the present day market similar to the peak in 1998?

The chart below shows the four months leading up to the 1998 plunge (see orange box).  Notice: (a) price was making a series of lower highs for almost three months below the red line, (b) the fastest moving average (blue) came down near the slowest moving average (black) in June 1998, which is indicative of a weakening stock market trend, (c) after the peak was made, the vulnerable trend allowed the blue moving average (MA) to drop rapidly toward the black moving average, eventually resulting in the blue MA moving from the top of the moving average cluster to the bottom, and (d) after that point, really bad things happened.

ccm-short-takes-1998-stock-plunge-a.png

HOW DOES THE SAME CHART LOOK TODAY?

The answer to the question above is “much better”.  Instead of threatening to move to the bottom of the moving average cluster, the fastest moving average (blue) remains firmly on top, which is indicative of a strong bullish trend.  Instead of price making a series of lower highs as it did below the red line in 1998, the S&P 500 has printed several new all-time highs over the last four months.

ccm-short-takes-1998-stock-plunge-b.png

MORAL OF THE STORY

While anything can happen in the markets, the present day trend in the S&P 500 has a stronger and more sustainable look than the S&P 500 did before and after the peak in 1998.  Strong trends, similar to the one we have in 2018, typically go on to print a new closing high after relatively shallow (2% to 6%) pullbacks.

The comments above are based on the facts we have in hand today.  If the data deteriorates in a meaningful manner, we will classify the decline as “volatility to respect” and make any necessary defensive chess moves.  Under our approach and based on our timeframe, that has not happened yet, and thus, the normal two-day pullback falls into the “volatility to ignore” category.

We will continue to take it day by day, monitoring the hard data with a flexible, unbiased, and open mind.  If action needs to be taken, it will be taken.

Subscribe to NFTRH Premium for an in-depth weekly market report, interim updates and NFTRH+ chart and trade ideas; or the free eLetter for an introduction to our work. You can also keep up to date with plenty of actionable public content at NFTRH.com. Or follow via Twitter @BiiwiiNFTRH, StockTwits or RSS. Also check out the quality market writers at Biiwii.com.