Chart: TED Spread and LIBOR-OIS

By Callum Thomas

Here’s a couple of interesting charts which are behaving in a boring fashion.  The first is the 3 month LIBOR-OIS spread, and the second is the TED spread.  Both are basically measures of funding stress/bank credit risk, and ever since the financial crisis have attracted as much attention as risk gauges as the VIX (equity volatility index).  Even in an environment of quantitative tightening both are behaving in a fairly subdued manner.  It goes to show how unperturbed US markets have been in the face of risk flareups in Europe and in particular emerging markets.  Of course, as with the VIX, contrarians will note that the time to worry is not when these metrics are spiking, but when they are “too low” and indicate complacency.  Certainly indicators to have on your radar.


Looking for deeper insights?  Try taking a free trial of our institutional research service.

Support 100% ad-free by making a donation of your choice!

Or better yet, subscribe to NFTRH Premium for an in-depth weekly market report, interim updates and NFTRH+ chart and trade ideas to get even more bang for your buck. You can also keep up to date with plenty of actionable public content at by using the email form on the right sidebar. Or follow via Twitter @BiiwiiNFTRH, StockTwits or RSS. Also check out the quality market writers at

Completely Full of It

By Jeffrey Snider

In June 2008, ICAP actually launched a US-based alternative to LIBOR. It ended up as nothing more than one very minor footnote lost in a sea of more pressing problems and events. Still, that they even tried is somewhat significant and relevant to today.

Before the whole cheating scandal came out, there were questions surrounding just what LIBOR was indicating. The major difference for this upstart New York Funding Rate (NYFR) was it as a mid-rate rather than an own-rate. In truth, this wasn’t really much of a distinction at all, but at the time it seemed important to certain people (at ICAP, apparently, encouraged by others).

Though it was a New York survey, they were still interested about conditions in the eurodollar market (though I still can’t figure out how and why nobody ever seemed to appreciate the full ramifications of what that meant). At odds was the feeling banks handing in their LIBOR panels to the British Bankers Association might have been shy about doing so because it reflected their “own” borrowing costs. Possible stigma about being more honest, and potentially making things worse, led some to suspect LIBOR wasn’t a true enough picture of funding conditions if individual firms were ever tempted to fudge.

Continue reading Completely Full of It